<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Archives of ctltheory for Sep15-98</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFF00" LINK="#FF0000" VLINK="#FF0000">
<!-- <CENTER><IMG SRC="http://your.server.com/your.banner.gif"BORDER=0></CENTER> -->
<P>
<CENTER>
<TABLE BORDER="0">
<TR>
<TD ALIGN="CENTER" COLSPAN="2">
<FONT SIZE=+2><B>Archives of ctltheory for Sep15-98</B></FONT><BR><HR></TD>
</TR><TR>
<TD ALIGN="LEFT"><B>Tue, 15 Sep 1998</B></TD>
<TD ALIGN="RIGHT"><B>Vol. 1.13</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</CENTER>
<P>
<A NAME="Contents"><STRONG>Contents</STRONG></A>
<BR>
<HR WIDTH=50% ALIGN="left">
<BR>
<UL>01. <A HREF="#SUBJECT01">PPM</A> (Trevor)<BR>
<A NAME="SUBJECT01"></A><A HREF="#Contents">Return to Contents</A><P>----------------------------------------------------------------------<P>Date: 15 Sep 1998 18:23:55 -0400<BR>
From: Trevor <aki@xs4all.nl><BR>
Subject: PPM<P><P> PPM INFORMATION RELEASE:<P><BR>
Recently, a "Perpetual Pattern Machine" was terminated (due to<BR>
reasignment of computational facilities) after around thirteen hours of<BR>
apparently successful continual operation.<P> Auto-morphogenetic and other anti bit-rot processing techniques were<BR>
used in a series of experiments involving small ecologies of<BR>
Movable Finite Automata to study resistance to entropic decay in<BR>
conditions of intense feedback.<P> The systems investigate the mechanism of continual (non-biological,<BR>
i.e. non-sexual) evolution in closed systems. Once started these<BR>
processes are completely deterministic.<P> Contining the trend towards simplicity, the current series is<BR>
reduced to parallel sets of basic processesing units variably scanning<BR>
through the image in an ordered manner (Space-Time Processing).<P><BR>
A major problem is the question of proof: Due to a random start<BR>
(big bang), each "existance" is one of an extremely large set of<BR>
possible trajectories and each trajectory which has not (yet)<BR>
degenerated into chaos or repetition may of course do so at any moment<BR>
in the future. Chaos (as a subjective phenomenon) is fairly easy to<BR>
recognise -but how does one watch a large number of "existances" for<BR>
an infinite length of time to see if they are repeating (how does one<BR>
compare an image with one from three days earlier that looked a bit<BR>
similar)? How similar must images be in order to be concidered<BR>
"repetitive" (or how different to be concidered as evolving)?<P> Initially as a practical measure (in order to improve performance on<BR>
a fairly slow Amiga 3000) most internal integer functions were<BR>
represented<BR>
by look-up tables. This gives the additional advantage that the<BR>
underlying<BR>
conceptual model of the "Turing Machine" becomes more explicit and<BR>
therefore more easilly integrated into a "Parametrical Space" model<BR>
so the process becomes more obviously concerned with the transformation<BR>
of closed ordered sets.<P> The look-up tables also make more explicit the nature (dimensions) of<BR>
the spaces involved as well as the transformations concerned and so may<BR>
therefore form a tentative step towards a "fungible" computer.<P><P> Institute for Autogenetics<BR>
and Metamorphology<BR>
Amsterdam, September 1998<P><P><BR>
</UL>
<HR WIDTH=30% ALIGN=left>
<A HREF="mailto:ctltheory@lists.timesup.org"> Post a message to the list</A><P>
<A HREF="index.html">Return to Sep. Index</A><BR>
<HR WIDTH=30% ALIGN=left>
</BODY></HTML>